What is freakonomics

In the U. Also, our global-warming chapter in SuperFreakonomics caused downright apoplexy among a certain quadrant of environmentalists. Q: What did it feel like to have Freakonomics turned into a movie? But the filmmakers — lead producer Chad Troutwine and an army of talent producers, directors, and others — did a great job turning the book into visual storytelling. Q: What are you guys up to now? A: Levitt still teaches at the University of Chicago , and has also founded a consulting firm called The Greatest Good.

Dubner keeps busy with the Freakonomics Radio show and other writing projects. Also, they both have kids. And Levitt plays a lot of golf. Q: How do I contact you guys, or your lecture agent, or the book publicist? A: All that information can be found right here. Q: Do you read all the e-mails that people send you? A: Yes. But do we answer them all? Unfortunately, no, although we do the best we can. Sometimes we also post interesting correspondence on the blog. A: One of us is a numbers guy and the other is a word guy, but we both like pictures.

The design firm Number 17 made it all come together. Q: Do you have anything else to add? A: Apparently not. In one of the earliest Freakonomics Radio episodes No. Now the kids are old enough to talk — and they have a lot to say. We hear about nature vs. NSQ Ep. Sign up for the Freakonomics Newsletter. Is the U.

Really Less Corrupt Than China? Since their book, Dubner and Levitt have built a whole enterprise centered on Freakonomics. They launched a website in , came out with a follow-up book, SuperFreakonomics in , released a film adaption of their work in , and started a popular radio program and podcast Freakonomics Radio in Popular episodes have centered on how people think more expensive wine tastes better and the power of bundling temptations with tasks e.

Thanks to the success and popularity of the brand, offbeat analyses of sociocultural and economic topics in general have become synonymous with Freakonomics , as has the discipline of behavioral economics, a favorite of the Freakonomics team. Tournaments have a place in economics. One of the insights popularised by Freakonomics back in was the idea that some jobs are tournament-like. Freakonomics remains a popular source for economic discussion in popular culture at least for the NPR-listening, Malcolm Gladwell-reading sort.

Freakonomics is also touchstone for out-of-the-box, counterintuitive approaches to sociology, psychology, and, yes, economics. Basically a new age version of 'Freakonomics' with some interesting ideas and a different approach to behavioral economics. Reflexive contrarianism at its silliest. This is not meant to be a formal definition of Freakonomics like most terms we define on Dictionary. Feedback Tired of Typos?